Adeline 发表于 2026-1-1 00:46
Why has Donbass, a territory of Ukraine, been inexplicably taken away by Russia? What is Putin's pur ...
It is a fact that Donbass was assigned to Ukraine after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, but most of the ethnic Russian groups live there. However, Ukraine not only fails to protect them but also persecutes them. Whether to join NATO or not is already a separate matter. To put it bluntly, Ukraine simply doesn't value them!
The draft ceasefire agreement between Russia and Ukraine, proposed after the recent negotiations between the United States, Europe, and Ukraine, is entirely biased towards the EU and Ukraine. As a result, Zelensky has gained confidence and once again challenged Russia.
Whether Ukraine wants to join NATO and who they choose as their president are their own affairs. The real problem for Ukraine is that they have lost their national credibility. Since the Minsk Agreement, Ukraine's national credit has been completely bankrupted!
Zelensky still can't figure out the situation... Even as an outsider, I understand that there is only one scenario for Donbass that Ukraine can reclaim: an asteroid ☄️ hitting the capital of Moscow
Skye 发表于 2026-1-1 00:47
Zelensky still can't figure out the situation... Even as an outsider, I understand that there is onl ...
The reserves of coal mines in Donbass account for 40% of Ukraine's total, and iron ore reserves account for 30%. Losing this area is equivalent to cutting off the legs of Ukraine's industry. Zelensky must defend it tenaciously
If one truly wants to help Ukraine, the most direct support should be in terms of personnel and weapons, not so-called financial commitments. Thinking about future funds before the war is even over gives the impression that it's uncertain whether others will give it to you as a charity. The fundamental premise is that you must have value. Therefore, no matter what the outcome is, Ukraine is destined to be the losing side. It's quite pitiful to have such a leader chosen by themselves
阿力曼 发表于 2026-1-1 00:47
If one truly wants to help Ukraine, the most direct support should be in terms of personnel and weap ...
Nowadays, there are hardly any people left in Wukua, and many are dying every day. In the end, even if there's money, no one will dare to go up.
"Laughable. What you can't get on the battlefield, you can't get at the negotiating table either. Keep fighting, the more you fight, the fewer cards Ozawa has. What negotiation agreement? To put it bluntly, it's a surrender agreement. Russia gets the land, the United States gets the minerals, Europe gets the promises, and Ukraine? Oh, the glory belongs to Ukraine."
It seems that the Russia-Ukraine conflict may not even end next year. No matter how long the conflict lasts, only one party will benefit, and that is the United States of America.
Ukraine is still indulging in wishful thinking, thinking that if it had remained neutral and not joined NATO, it would not have been invaded by Russia.