The U.S. Department of Justice has released heavily redacted files related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, drawing fierce dissatisfaction from his victims.

On Friday, December 19, the DOJ began publishing a trove of Epstein-related documents and photos on its official website. Among the figures referenced or depicted are former Democratic President Bill Clinton, disgraced British Prince Andrew, and the late pop icon Michael Jackson.

Former President Donald Trump had long opposed the release of Epstein case files but ultimately backed legislation passed by overwhelming majorities in both houses of Congress—succumbing to intense pressure from fellow Republicans. Even so, much of the material released on Friday was heavily redacted, with key content obscured. Notably, the newly disclosed files contain almost no references to Trump himself.

Virginia Giuffre, a woman who accused Epstein of abuse, told CBS News: “Release the documents unredacted. Stop hiding names that should never have been blacked out. Are we protecting survivors, or these elite men? This so-called transparency only serves to redact the names of survivors and victims.”


Another Epstein victim, Sarah Ransome, stated she spent hours poring over the files in search of her victim impact statement and records of calls to the FBI tip line—only to find “nothing at all.” “Is this the best the government can do? Even congressional legislation can’t deliver justice for us.”

The released files and photos include multiple images of Clinton, including shots of him relaxing in a hot tub and posing with Epstein. One photo from the latest batch shows Clinton with a woman aboard a private jet, according to Reuters.

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung seized on the release to attack Clinton. In response, a Clinton spokesperson fired back: “If the White House truly wanted to protect Clinton, would it have delayed releasing these documents until late Friday night—months after they could have been made public? This is clearly an attempt to deflect attention from its own issues.”

The U.S. Department of Justice has released heavily redacted files related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, drawing fierce dissatisfaction from his victims.

On Friday, December 19, the DOJ began publishing a trove of Epstein-related documents and photos on its official website. Among the figures referenced or depicted are former Democratic President Bill Clinton, disgraced British Prince Andrew, and the late pop icon Michael Jackson.

Former President Donald Trump had long opposed the release of Epstein case files but ultimately backed legislation passed by overwhelming majorities in both houses of Congress—succumbing to intense pressure from fellow Republicans. Even so, much of the material released on Friday was heavily redacted, with key content obscured. Notably, the newly disclosed files contain almost no references to Trump himself.

Virginia Giuffre, a woman who accused Epstein of abuse, told CBS News: “Release the documents unredacted. Stop hiding names that should never have been blacked out. Are we protecting survivors, or these elite men? This so-called transparency only serves to redact the names of survivors and victims.”


Another Epstein victim, Sarah Ransome, stated she spent hours poring over the files in search of her victim impact statement and records of calls to the FBI tip line—only to find “nothing at all.” “Is this the best the government can do? Even congressional legislation can’t deliver justice for us.”

The released files and photos include multiple images of Clinton, including shots of him relaxing in a hot tub and posing with Epstein. One photo from the latest batch shows Clinton with a woman aboard a private jet, according to Reuters.

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung seized on the release to attack Clinton. In response, a Clinton spokesperson fired back: “If the White House truly wanted to protect Clinton, would it have delayed releasing these documents until late Friday night—months after they could have been made public? This is clearly an attempt to deflect attention from its own issues.”