Ophelia 发表于 2025-12-30 01:59
Since the author is in the United States, they can roughly count the number of homeless people and c ...

Hehe, who are you asking to gloat? The question itself is quite interesting. Direct response to the author: In addition to those who advocate the European and American values of "strength is everything", "survival of the fittest", and "law of the jungle" (the United States can get a bigger share of the cake if it weakens), there are also those who are oppressed and bullied by the United States (the United States has more room for development if it weakens itself), including some people in the United States (taking advantage of the opportunity to plunder the wealth of bankrupt middle class and poor people), as well as some people who follow their nature (gloating over others' tragedies), and so on.

汪克健 发表于 2025-12-30 01:59
Hehe, who are you asking to gloat? The question itself is quite interesting. Direct response to th ...

The big media in the United States, CNN, Wall Street, or CBN, don't seem to be a bit like exporting to domestic sales.

There are 320 million people in the United States, with a fertility rate of 1.6, and approximately 3 million immigrants enter each year. Why can the population be maintained for a long time? 2. Do not use Chinese people who have gone to the United States as an example. Chinese people do not need to take out student loans after finishing their studies. If they have serious illnesses and return to China for medical treatment, they usually have family support behind them. You got a bug stuck, okay?

晏明 发表于 2025-12-30 01:59
There are 320 million people in the United States, with a fertility rate of 1.6, and approximately 3 ...

Chinese people who run to the United States have a return ticket, and if the situation is not good, they can run back. Where can Americans go? It's difficult for those who have no identity to sneak out and come back without identification. Once something happens, they can only wait for death

Katherine 发表于 2025-12-30 02:00
Chinese people who run to the United States have a return ticket, and if the situation is not good ...

The United States treats ordinary people as' disposable batteries', and selling blood can only provide you with the most basic three meals a day. If you want to lift yourself out of poverty by selling blood, then you are a pipe dream

作者把斩杀线与触发斩杀的条件混为一谈了。在斩杀线下，需要的是一次意外事件。

高贵滴豆腐 发表于 2025-12-30 02:00
作者把斩杀线与触发斩杀的条件混为一谈了。在斩杀线下，需要的是一次意外事件。 ...

I dare say I don't understand anything else. I have a classmate in the United States who didn't dare to get sick when he first arrived. It's really too expensive. Now life is good because he and his wife work 365 days a day and work overtime (not to mention that the United States doesn't work overtime)! The cost of returning to China starts at $20000 per trip, so the place where I haven't lived twice after going out for ten years can't help but have marijuana neighbors who often smoke. He also bought a gun, paid taxes and insurance for more than 20 points, and the house tax is several thousand dollars a year

The elimination of the lower classes in American society is determined by its social Darwinism ideology, and Western countries will also follow this path in the future. This is determined by their system, which prioritizes the protection of capital interests. When the world cannot plunder them, they will only sacrifice their own weak.

向北方 发表于 2025-12-30 02:00
The elimination of the lower classes in American society is determined by its social Darwinism ideol ...

用另一个角度来阐述一下，如果真这样成为普遍现象，为啥全世界都怕漂亮国三分？

从来不迷信美国，但以我们目前的发展程度和60%民众的富裕程度去嘲笑美国，也明显有点自高自大了。 之前与朋友聊天的时候，有人说我们最高科技水平的战机还比不上美国的f15，我是狠狠的教育科普、打击和嘲笑了他。 美国斩杀线的基础是年收入14万美元以及有房有车的基础上。我们以赚什么货币花什么货币的基础上讨论： 二三线城市，夫妻的年收入都有14万，如果有六个钱包支持及小孩上公办学校，则生活中产；如果没有六个钱包支持，小孩，幼儿园小学初高中上私立学校，那么也没有积蓄，同样经不起小风小浪，也有这么一条线。 一线超一线城市，夫妻俩年收入14万，恐怕根本没资格有房，有强大后盾的除外。如果不顾一切买房，后果同样恐怖。 况且人家还没有我们这种不幸买了烂尾楼，除了丢首付，还要每月还房贷的违背经济规律、违背基本正义和道义的事情。 以上人士的父母如果是城市户口并有退休金还好说，如果双方的父母都是年迈农村人，那可能也只是在生存线上挣扎而已！ 所以，即使美国有斩杀线，也只是因为他们的提前消费和低储蓄；如果我们没有，也只是因为人民的勤劳、能吃苦、节省，以及高储蓄而已！ 别人对流浪汉、失业以及残障人士的补助恐怕比我们高十倍吧。