Someone has already reported "Lao A," the guy who talked about the "kill line," to the U.S. government. Can Lao A’s connections protect him?

Reports are already being filed externally—some to ICE, some to the FBI, and also to HHS-OIG and even the White House.

If these pro-foreign informants succeed in their reports, can Lao A really be saved by his connections—those so-called "Long Live Mentor," "Senior Brother," or "Imam"?

I have no intention of discussing the truthfulness of Lao A’s livestream content—whether it’s true or not simply doesn’t concern me.

However, I can state very confidently that the person who wrote this complaint letter likely has little understanding of U.S. law. Moreover, the letter is steeped in a mindset that reads like: “I’m appealing directly to the central government—please send down the imperial sword to punish you!” and “Whichever agency sounds most powerful, I’ll go bang the drum at their office to file my grievance.”

First, HHS-OIG (the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General) has no jurisdiction over him.

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 215 /

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) was established by law as an independent and objective oversight body within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Its core mission is to prevent fraud and abuse and to promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in HHS programs and operations. To fulfill this mission, OIG:

Conducts and supervises audits, investigations, evaluations, and inspections of HHS programs and operations;

Identifies systemic vulnerabilities in HHS programs that may lead to fraud and abuse, and makes recommendations to prevent recurrence;

Leads and coordinates efforts to prevent and detect fraud and abuse in HHS programs;

Investigates individuals who commit wrongdoing harming HHS programs or beneficiaries, and takes appropriate enforcement actions—including imposing administrative penalties on healthcare providers who engage in prohibited conduct under Medicare and Medicaid;

Regularly and comprehensively reports to the HHS Secretary and Congress on problems and deficiencies in HHS programs and operations, along with the necessity and progress of corrective actions.[1]

That’s a lot of text, so in plain language: OIG functions like an internal disciplinary inspection team embedded within a ministry. It only oversees HHS’s own personnel, finances, and operations—and at most handles cases involving Medicare/Medicaid fraud or misuse of federal funds. As for local matters, it avoids involvement whenever possible.

And this isn’t just my opinion—it’s what HHS itself states. If you don’t believe me, check its official website[2]:

Most tips reported to OIG fall into the following categories:

Fraud/waste in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grants,

Crimes or gross misconduct by HHS employees/contractors,

Conflicts of interest involving HHS employees,

Cost overruns in HHS programs due to mismanagement,

False applications for HHS contracts/grants,

Failure to deliver services/products under HHS contracts/grants,

False/fraudulent claims submitted to Medicare/Medicaid,

Kickbacks/inducements for referrals by Medicare/Medicaid providers,

Medical identity theft involving Medicare/Medicaid beneficiaries,

Door-to-door solicitation targeting Medicare/Medicaid beneficiaries,

Misrepresentation of Medicare private plans,

Hospitals failing to evaluate and stabilize emergency patients,

Abuse/neglect in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities,

Failure to pay child support (limited to interstate cases).

If Lao A’s statements were true, he’s still just a college student—who (1) doesn’t work for the federal Department of Health and Human Services; (2) has no medical license; (3) isn’t involved in actual healthcare fraud or “abuse” (i.e., exploiting systemic loopholes); (4) doesn’t work in hospitals or nursing homes; and (5) has nothing to do with HHS grants or contracts. So how exactly could the HHS OIG possibly intervene?

Unless, of course, someone wants to investigate whether he has out-of-state illegitimate children whose child support he hasn’t paid?

Clearly, this complainant mistakenly views the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as if it were China’s National Health Commission—a central authority wielding an “imperial sword.” They might even naively imagine that once these officials get involved, “the skies over Seattle will turn blue again…” Oh wait—Seattle is already blue, being governed by Democrats. But regardless, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is not China’s NHCC. At best, after reading such a complaint, they might forward it to local authorities for handling; it would be generous of them not to just send a dismissive email.

Second, merely stating “I want to kill white Americans” does not meet the criminal threshold under 18 U.S.C. § 249.

The full text of 18 U.S.C. § 249 is lengthy, so I’ll quote the distilled summary from the Library of Congress’s Overview of Federal Hate Crime Laws[3]:

18 U.S.C. § 249: Prohibits willfully causing bodily injury (or attempting to do so through fire, firearm, etc.) to any person because of their actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability.

Any person with basic literacy and common sense would reasonably understand that this statute targets either (a) perpetrators who have actually caused bodily harm, (b) those who attempted but failed, or (c) at minimum, individuals who took concrete preparatory steps toward committing such acts. Lao A, however, merely made threatening remarks during a livestream without taking any actual action. This clearly cannot be construed as “willfully causing bodily injury.”

The statute also covers kidnapping, lynching, and sexual abuse motivated by the same biases—but merely stating an intent to commit such acts, without action, plainly does not violate this law.

Moreover, anyone with even modest legal knowledge knows that the U.S. operates under both state and federal legal systems. To avoid wasting judicial resources, 18 U.S.C. § 249 includes subsection (b), which states:

(b) Certification Requirement.—

(1) In general.—The Federal Government may not prosecute any offense under this section unless the Attorney General, or his designee,[4] issues a written certification that one of the following exists:

(A) The State lacks jurisdiction;

(B) The State requests federal jurisdiction;

(C) The State’s prosecution, judgment, or sentence demonstrably fails to vindicate the Federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence; or

(D) Federal prosecution is in the public interest and necessary to secure substantial justice.

So it turns out that even in America, after filing your grievance with the “central government,” you still have to hope some high-level official sees your petition and personally approves a directive for local authorities to “handle it strictly, severely, and swiftly.” Doesn’t that sound oddly familiar?

References:

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ ... /pdf/2018-23935.pdf

https://oig.hhs.gov/about-oig/

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47060#fn234

[4] This “designee” refers to the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division (28 C.F.R. § 0.50).

The "kill line" was created during Biden's era of massive fiscal and monetary stimulus—what does it have to do with Trump?

Lao A merely exposed the severe damage inflicted on America by the quartet of Blinken, Harris, Yellen, and Austin—their actions that reversed historical progress. This damage has now been decisively corrected by the wise and mighty President Trump. Lao A’s bold exposure further proves Trump’s greatness.

I’ve been following Boston Roundface for a very long time—since back when he was still in Boston, USA. Both shortly before and after his return to China, Roundface repeatedly hinted that he was being surveilled and followed in the U.S., implying he didn’t come back after completing his studies but rather fled back to China in haste. After returning, he even directly thanked the Chinese embassy for helping him escape back home—but no matter how much we asked, he never explained exactly what happened. The more you think about it, the more chilling it becomes.

Yesterday, I came across a TikTok video posted by an anonymous person (face not shown), who said Lao A is very lucky: America’s ideological propaganda and regulatory oversight agencies—being Democratic strongholds—were among the first and hardest hit during the Trump-Musk government downsizing turmoil. These agencies are now effectively paralyzed; many staff were abruptly fired and, coinciding with the suspension of food stamps under the “Big and Beautiful” Act and the federal government shutdown, were forced into the “kill line” and eliminated. However, Trump only opposes these agencies being controlled by Democrats—he doesn’t oppose the existence of the agencies themselves. So they will inevitably be rebuilt sooner or later, and that’s when Lao A will face his greatest danger. Of course, Lao A himself has already said he can’t hold on anymore—he’s decided not to pursue a PhD and is preparing to return to China. I wish him the same good luck as Boston Roundface.

Seeing how heated the discussion in the comments section is, I’ll take a guess at Lao A’s basic personal information.

First, his surname is Kong. Given that his grandfather was once wealthy, his generational name (zibei) wouldn’t be too high or too low in the Confucius family genealogy: there’s a 10% chance he’s from the “De” (德) generation, 40% for “Wei” (维), 40% for “Chui” (垂), and 10% for “You” (佑) or lower.

His English name is Alex, so his Chinese given name likely corresponds to one of its syllables—possibilities include Ai (艾), Ai (霭), Yi (乂), Ai (爱), Li (黎), Li (理), Li (礼), Ke (柯), Ke (轲), or Ke (恪)—with “Ke” being the most probable.

Putting it together, I suspect his real name is either Kong Weike or Kong Chuike.

Oh, and by the way—some people claim this guy’s QQ number ends with “Zhong,” so they say his name is Kong Xuanzhong. But come on—a Kong descendant who brings ritual texts to ancestral graves would really be named Kong Xuanzhong? Are you kidding me? Even if you told me he was named Kong Dezhong (in fact, in reality, many in the “De” generation do have names ending in “Zhong”), I’d believe it more. (Added on Dec. 31)

His grandfather was from Qufu, Shandong (though personally, I think he’s lying—it was probably his great-grandfather). Given that his father worked as a construction foreman, his grandfather was likely a cadre—perhaps a company commander—taken out of the region by the New Fourth Army in 1946. Combined with Lao A’s mention of herding sheep as a child, the family probably settled in eastern Inner Mongolia—cities or leagues like the illustrious Tongliao.

He mentioned a classmate who used all his knowledge just to avoid dying from fortified supplements, and Lao A himself has taken anatomy lab—so he’s most likely studying pharmacy, not clinical medicine.

Importing Gundam models in the U.S. must be a lucrative gig. According to him, each Gundam unit sells for 1,000toseveralthousanddollarsdependingoncondition,andheearnsatleasta510,000 per month—not counting his $20/hour base wage. His professor really treated him well.

Below is the original answer:

Lao A’s professor has disciples and protégés embedded throughout Washington State’s law enforcement and security apparatus;

Lao A’s ex-girlfriend’s father is a top-tier Seattle attorney with nine-figure net worth;

Yinpa Ge is the youngest son of some major aristocratic family;

Dashixiong has connections across every major corporation in Seattle;

Heige is the son of a chieftain from a small African nation;

The Iraqi sister and Slavic aunt were minor warlords back home before coming to the U.S., with multi-generational ties to the CIA;

The imam at the mosque where Lao A distributes charity meals has deep roots in the community—gang members don’t even dare speak loudly in his presence;

The redneck buddy may not have many talents, but he did spend over a decade killing people in Afghanistan; Lao A personally saved the lives of his son and grandson;

Lao A’s fellow students in Islamic jurisprudence can still rally enough people to show support when needed;

And Lao A’s own father was a construction foreman in the 1980s–90s who managed to survive China’s anti-gang crackdowns unscathed.

In short—this guy is invincible.

Are you suggesting that a pro-foreign informant is reporting to a Republican administration a foreign student who holds a valid student visa in a blue state, has an official letter of recommendation from a university professor for running errands on the professor’s behalf, and maintains connections with local community groups, religious organizations, and elite circles?

Everyone, you need to understand that grassroots governance in Lao Mei is essentially autonomous.

At the local level, Lao Mei’s governance is primarily carried out by religious groups, gangs, guilds, and private militias of local gentry—the state’s power only protects a tiny minority of “Tianlong people” (elite insiders).

Now let’s examine Lao A’s social circle:

The professor, Dashixiong, and his ex-girlfriend’s father—all thoroughly charmed by him—are Tianlong people. Especially the ex-girlfriend’s dad, being a lawyer, is a powerful figure even among the Tianlong elite.

The imam and his fellow students in Islamic jurisprudence who treat him like family—that’s the religious faction, with manpower and firearms at their disposal, and given their religious nature, they likely have explosives too.

Yinpa Ge, who treats him like a blood brother—that’s local gentry.

The redneck older brother whose entire family owes Lao A life debts—that’s the head of a gentry-led militia, also armed and commanding loyal followers.

To put it bluntly, if Lao A simply rolls up his bedding and takes refuge in a mosque, nobody—not even the mightiest authority—can touch him. He’s backed by both the underworld and the establishment.

Moreover, even if you report him to the government, what force would they actually use against this small fry? At most, they’d send local police. But here’s the thing: Lao A is the one collecting Gundam models. If he stops collecting them, those uncollected Gundams become a huge headache for the local cops. So, do you really think the local police and the Gundam collector are on opposing sides—or are they breathing through the same nostril?

One advantage of America’s rotational leadership system is that all the problems you see in real life can always be blamed on the other party’s turn in power.

This foreign youngster has very objectively criticized the shortcomings of the previous administration—protect him!

What’s especially hilarious is this: why do pro-Western pundits, American apologists, and foreign-worshipping lackeys resort to “reporting” someone—a tactic dripping with the style of authoritarian regimes?

Isn’t America supposed to be democratic and free, with a relaxed political atmosphere where anyone can speak their mind freely? Aren’t Americans supposed to distrust officials like thieves, fear power like fire, and guard against abuse of authority like a flood?

In truth, you pro-Western pundits, American loyalists, and foreign-worshipping servants know perfectly well—don’t you?—that you yourselves recognize the U.S. system for what it really is: an authoritarian regime.

I’ve never quite figured out what the overseas Chinese “fact-checking” circles are actually busy doing.

They constantly claim they’re “exposing the truth to the international community,” yet their entire output is in Chinese.

Their audience consists either of their own side or their sworn enemies—both groups have their positions permanently etched onto their foreheads.

If you genuinely want to lodge a complaint with foreign authorities, shouldn’t you first learn to speak their language?

Delivering impassioned speeches to an audience that has already chosen its camp—

this isn’t so much about disseminating facts as it is about emotional brawling and seeing who can get angrier.

By contrast, the “Great Translation Movement” is logically consistent on this point.

They actually translate content into languages foreigners can understand—

and indeed, as they hoped, they promptly got scolded by those very foreigners.