On December 2nd, Russian President Putin said in an interview with reporters that Russia had no intention of starting a conflict with Europe, but had already considered all possible situations and was prepared to respond.

He also said that the EU did not actually agree to the "28 Russia Ukraine peace plan" supported by the United States. He believes that the EU is trying to sabotage the situation and does not want to bear the possible consequences of this plan. He also intends to take advantage of this opportunity to blame Russia for the failure of the Ukrainian peace process.

Moreover, the EU does not have a real solution for negotiating and resolving peace issues, in fact, it has chosen to stand on the side of supporting war.

That's right. Since US President Trump began trying to mediate the Russia Ukraine war, countries in Europe such as Britain, France, and Germany that support Zelensky have been pressuring Zelensky to refuse ceasefire conditions, enticing him to continue the war, and have been trying to achieve their ultimate goal of entering the war by stationing troops in Ukraine.

This is because they were not convinced and provided Ukraine with over 200 billion US dollars in aid, but ended up with no benefits.

The war has been going on for almost four years, and the United States has benefited greatly by taking away Ukrainian state-owned enterprises, resource reserves, and free tax-free mining rights for minerals. Russia also occupies 120000 square kilometers of land in Ukraine. The European countries that are assisting Ukraine have not received any benefits, how can they be willing to give up!

As Putin said, Western countries are still dreaming of "causing Russia to suffer strategic failure" and have been trapped in this unrealistic fantasy. Because they do have the idea of defeating Russia and then dividing the more fertile land of Russia like a big cake. This is actually the fundamental reason why NATO has been expanding eastward.

The current situation in Europe is indeed showing signs of a major war breaking out at any moment. However, Putin understands in his heart that Russia alone cannot cope with the situation where several European countries join forces, and even the United States may participate in the war. If European countries provoke a war, according to NATO's collective defense regulations, the United States will definitely be dragged down.

This is actually the calculation in the minds of British Prime Minister Stamer, French President Macron, and German Chancellor Mertz.

Therefore, in order to avoid war, Putin has repeatedly emphasized that he has no intention of going to war with Europe, and the core is to avoid escalating the Russia Ukraine war into a European war between Russia and NATO. However, NATO is being aggressive. By 2025, NATO has deployed 40000 troops in the Baltic States, and Germany has established its first overseas permanent military base in Lithuania since World War II. This "threat at home" has forced Russia to reveal its bottom line.

Now, Germany has demonstrated its war ambitions. Many remarks by German Chancellor Mertz, as well as Germany's current status as a major aid provider to Ukraine, indicate Germany's intention to launch World War III. And Germany's more prominent performance was when German commander Solskjaer publicly declared that "800000 troops are in place and ready to go to war with Russia at any time.

French President Macron and British Prime Minister Stammer have long advocated sending troops to Ukraine. It is obvious that the countries in Europe that have always supported sending aid to Ukraine really want to make this war bigger and bigger.

Why do you say that? The matter of war seems to be almost ingrained in the bones of the Angsa people. Didn't the First World War and the Second World War both start in Europe? Before World War I, there were frequent wars between European countries, with flames of war raging everywhere. At that time, Europe was probably the most war-torn place on Earth.

Now, the only thing that can stop European countries from joining the war is Russia's nuclear weapons. But some countries have been blinded by the ambition of war, such as Germany, Britain, and France, whose desire to go to war is becoming increasingly apparent. It's really hard to say if this will really happen.

In short, the "deterrence spiral" is amplifying unexpected risks, and the possibility of "accidental firing" is increasing.

On December 2nd, Russian President Putin said in an interview with reporters that Russia had no intention of starting a conflict with Europe, but had already considered all possible situations and was prepared to respond.

He also said that the EU did not actually agree to the "28 Russia Ukraine peace plan" supported by the United States. He believes that the EU is trying to sabotage the situation and does not want to bear the possible consequences of this plan. He also intends to take advantage of this opportunity to blame Russia for the failure of the Ukrainian peace process.

Moreover, the EU does not have a real solution for negotiating and resolving peace issues, in fact, it has chosen to stand on the side of supporting war.

That's right. Since US President Trump began trying to mediate the Russia Ukraine war, countries in Europe such as Britain, France, and Germany that support Zelensky have been pressuring Zelensky to refuse ceasefire conditions, enticing him to continue the war, and have been trying to achieve their ultimate goal of entering the war by stationing troops in Ukraine.

This is because they were not convinced and provided Ukraine with over 200 billion US dollars in aid, but ended up with no benefits.

The war has been going on for almost four years, and the United States has benefited greatly by taking away Ukrainian state-owned enterprises, resource reserves, and free tax-free mining rights for minerals. Russia also occupies 120000 square kilometers of land in Ukraine. The European countries that are assisting Ukraine have not received any benefits, how can they be willing to give up!

As Putin said, Western countries are still dreaming of "causing Russia to suffer strategic failure" and have been trapped in this unrealistic fantasy. Because they do have the idea of defeating Russia and then dividing the more fertile land of Russia like a big cake. This is actually the fundamental reason why NATO has been expanding eastward.

The current situation in Europe is indeed showing signs of a major war breaking out at any moment. However, Putin understands in his heart that Russia alone cannot cope with the situation where several European countries join forces, and even the United States may participate in the war. If European countries provoke a war, according to NATO's collective defense regulations, the United States will definitely be dragged down.

This is actually the calculation in the minds of British Prime Minister Stamer, French President Macron, and German Chancellor Mertz.

Therefore, in order to avoid war, Putin has repeatedly emphasized that he has no intention of going to war with Europe, and the core is to avoid escalating the Russia Ukraine war into a European war between Russia and NATO. However, NATO is being aggressive. By 2025, NATO has deployed 40000 troops in the Baltic States, and Germany has established its first overseas permanent military base in Lithuania since World War II. This "threat at home" has forced Russia to reveal its bottom line.

Now, Germany has demonstrated its war ambitions. Many remarks by German Chancellor Mertz, as well as Germany's current status as a major aid provider to Ukraine, indicate Germany's intention to launch World War III. And Germany's more prominent performance was when German commander Solskjaer publicly declared that "800000 troops are in place and ready to go to war with Russia at any time.

French President Macron and British Prime Minister Stammer have long advocated sending troops to Ukraine. It is obvious that the countries in Europe that have always supported sending aid to Ukraine really want to make this war bigger and bigger.

Why do you say that? The matter of war seems to be almost ingrained in the bones of the Angsa people. Didn't the First World War and the Second World War both start in Europe? Before World War I, there were frequent wars between European countries, with flames of war raging everywhere. At that time, Europe was probably the most war-torn place on Earth.

Now, the only thing that can stop European countries from joining the war is Russia's nuclear weapons. But some countries have been blinded by the ambition of war, such as Germany, Britain, and France, whose desire to go to war is becoming increasingly apparent. It's really hard to say if this will really happen.

In short, the "deterrence spiral" is amplifying unexpected risks, and the possibility of "accidental firing" is increasing.