That's right, it's what you know about data source pollution

那天刷到一个鉴别绿松石的帖子，竟然是把那个石头拍一张图片问DS，问他这是绿松石吗？或者这是什么材质的？这也太搞笑了吧，而且发帖人还特别相信DS，对它坚信不疑的。但是实际上DS对某些专业领域的，根本不专业，他只是用一些似是而非的话来糊弄。

戴轻花就不老花 发表于 2025-12-10 01:54
那天刷到一个鉴别绿松石的帖子，竟然是把那个石头拍一张图片问DS，问他这是绿松石吗？或者这是什么材质的？ ...

DS cannot recognize images and can only recognize text within images

看了你这个我忽然明白了，ai时代依旧会有信息差。

Yesterday, two people got into a fight, and one person directly posted an AI answer, but it obviously went against common sense... Thinking of the news of DS and foreign AI playing chess and fabricating new rules to win, I already feel that AI is not very pure, and when someone used it to polish a paper, they gave feedback that it compiled several references as sources

格局天下 发表于 2025-12-10 01:54
Yesterday, two people got into a fight, and one person directly posted an AI answer, but it obviousl ...

Yes, I used AI to search for the corresponding clauses for the issues found during the review process. Although it was much faster than searching on my own, and some perspectives were unexpected, out of the seventeen questions, one-third were correct, and several clauses were fabricated

一开始就不喜欢看ai的答案，还是看专业的信息靠谱。

最近发现ai写代码有一些典型错误，所以感觉ai其实是优质内容的一个大平均，它的水平不可能高于它的输入。挺期待未来咋发展的，应该会达到一种动态平衡

每次遇到客户说人家百度上是怎么说的，我们为什么和百度说的不一样，我就头大，现在各种ai，头更大了[呃R][呃R][呃R]他们为什么那么相信那些

ai是绝对客观的存在

胡开银 发表于 2025-12-10 01:55
ai是绝对客观的存在

是绝对客观地攫取所有网络内容：而网络内容不都是绝对客观的，人类上传的主观内容多而庞杂，ai能识别才能做到客观，但是ai没有生活在现实世界，有时候压根剔除不了玩笑话。